Saturday, January 21, 2012

Jane Prentice (LNP) - Response to Internet Filter/SOPA letter

Another response, this time from Jane Prentice, the member for Ryan (my electorate near Brisbane, QLD).

The Gist: 
"...the Coalition will continue to oppose Labor’s approach to regulating the internet and will continue to work with parents, ISPs and police to deliver common sense measures to protect young users from online content that is illegal or inappropriate."

Jane says "The Coalition" supports policies to protect young people from online threats through education and home-based filtering technologies.

Also slams the Labour Government, and Communications Minister Stephen Conroy.

Read the full response below...

Friday, January 20, 2012

Sandra Bayley (Greens) - Responding to "Internet Filtering / SOPA"


I recieved a response from Sandra Bayley, a candidate for the greens in my area.

The Gist:
"The Greens share many of your concern's over the Government's proposed Internet filter and the Stop Online Piracy Act."
Sandra also goes on to say that she's concerned about piracy and protecting children from harmful material on the Internet.

Read the full response below...

Australian Internet Filter, SOPA/PIPA and a Letters to my Elected Officials

Screw reading this, go STRAIGHT to the letter...

So did anyone actually read the link on the Wikipedia SOPA "Blackout" page? (Perhaps)

Did anyone notice the "What should I do now?" section? (Probably not)

Did anyone do anything about it? (Even less likely)

Will you assholes all whinge and whine when stupid legislation is passed by government (Most definitely)

YAY for apathy!

Anyhoooo...

Wikipedia has a note on it's front page suggesting that people write to their local representatives about these proposed American laws to "Stop Online Piracy (SOPA)" and "Protect Intellectual Property (PIPA)", also about our local "Net Filter" legislation that the Australian Government were trying to bring through last term...

I did what was requested, because I'm a sheep and do whatever Wikipedia tells me to do..

Click through to read my letter to our representatives..
It's very long, and probably quite predictable and very boring so:
- Read or don't.. I don't really care and won't be offended if you can't be bothered :)

If you find it useful, feel free to copy/paste whatever sections you like on to any of your respective rants to your local politicians or facebooks.

You could also do a 'find and replace' and make the letter about something completely different, say 'coal seam gas' or 'live animal export' though it seems unlikely that it'll make any sense :)

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Decision is made..

The decision is in, and I'm not happy!

On the House of Reps ballot, no one really impresses me. I have a lot more flexibility on the Senate ballot, so that'll have to be where I get out my frustrations and vote for REAL representatives.


House of Reps (Ryan Electorate)
I'm not hugely impressed by any of my local candidates (in Ryan).

Michael Johnson is well spoken but too conservative for me. He also indicated that he would vote to support Tony Abbott in a hung parliament, a BIG risk in my mind.

The greens response was not as thought out or considered as Michael's but their policies are generally ok.

The labor candidate hasn't impressed me at all, and nationally, they have engaged in a race to the right (or to the bottom) on issues such as asylum seekers and gay marriage. They've failed to deliver on the environment, they've bowed to pressure from the mining companies on taxing our limited resources fairly! - Poor effort guys!

In the House of Reps, Michael Johnson and The Greens should have been equal first place, but neither impress me enough to make me risk my vote. Which is what really shits me about this whole process!

Unfortunately after all of this, I have to vote labor.

The seat is marginal, and I don't want to risk an Abbott parliament. I'd like to have a local member that actually can represent me - but the shitty wedge politics of both major parties is forcing me to choose (this is exactly what they want to happen - the assholes!).


Given the importance of MANY other issues like the NBN, Mining Tax, Workers' entitlements. Their support for Economic stimulus, and spending on Infrastructure projects. I can't risk a vote for Abbott.


I will take the opportunity to harass the shit out of whatever candidate gets in over the next term - I despise both parties for putting me in this position!

The Senate
At least the senate casts a wide net over the whole state, I can choose from MANY more people.

Donald Bambrick, Peter Pyke, John Pyke (different parties - no relation?), E-Jay Lindsay-Park stand out in my mind, they are articulate, well spoken, and seem able to separate the bullshit from the truth.

I'm very impressed by Donald Bambrick, who on issue 4 (gay marriage) acknowledges that he's "Uncomfortable with this" - BUT is able to but his personal discomfort aside to support such legislation in the name of equality!

There are also some really well spoken politicians that are unfortunately batting for the wrong team. Noel Jackson is a well spoken individual, but his policies don't align with mine. Further, the Democratic Labor Party is a bunch of simplistic racist nuts in my opinion - they have some good policies sprinkled with generous servings of nonsense and racial division.

A One Nation senate candidate (Ian Nelson) I spoke to is the same! Quite reasonable and humanitarian, until it comes to the issue of "Dangerous Muslims and Lebanese". He's of course entitled to his opinion, but there's no way he could represent me!

Senate wise, I'll vote as per my Candidate Scores table, numbering every box under the line.

Good luck with whoever you vote for.

Bye.

QLD Senate - Tim Sheen (Australian Sex Party) - Phone Call

Spoke to Tim Sheen (QLD Senate - Australian Sex Party), asked him the 4 questions.

Quick Summary:
  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws]  *Has no considered response yet* 
  2. [The Internet Filter]  Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  *Has no considered response yet*
  4. [Gay marriage] For (#1 issue is separation of church and state)
Tim's main focus was on civil liberties, our discussion was mainly about how the current political system isn't working how it is supposed to with proper oversight and educated decision making.

Tim did discuss the other points (see below):

Monday, August 16, 2010

Not my representative: Intelligent people - Irrational Arguments

I was going to write specifically about a discussion I had with Ian Nelson (QLD Senate - One Nation). 


Instead I've decided to write about what frustrates me about intelligent, extremely passionate people with ideals based on incorrect facts and irrational arguments.


I just got off the phone to a One Nation senate candidate in Queensland - Ian Nelson. We had an excellent discussion about some of the "4 Questions".


The first impression I get is that here is a reasonable man. Like most of the candidates I've spoken to, he's well spoken and intelligent... 

QLD Senate - Larissa Waters (Greens) - Initial Reply

Larissa Waters responded in agreement with the Greens' policies. But did say she would be prepared to cross the floor as allowed by her party if she encountered an issue contrary to her own views.


Summary:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] Against 
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  For
  4. [Gay marriage] For
Email below...



QLD Senate - Libby Connors (Greens) - Initial Reply

Libby Connors responded saying "I am number 2 on the Qld Greens senate ticket and support the Greens policies on all 4 issues"


Quick Summary:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] Against 
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  For
  4. [Gay marriage] For

Email below...

QLD Senate - Jan McLucas (Labor) - Initial Reply

I received a response from the office of Jan McLucas (QLD Senate - Labor), a currently sitting senator. The response contained the usual statements along party lines and links to websites.


Quick Summary:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For 
  2. [The Internet Filter] For
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  For
  4. [Gay marriage] Against (but for more equal rights)
Full response below...

QLD Senate - John Pyke (Limit Pokies Group) - Initial Reply

John Pyke (Limit Pokies Group) has responded - note the AEC candidate details list John Pyke without any party name - but he identifies himself as "Limit Pokies Group". 


John's response on Hardening up Border Protection laws was excellent!

Quick Summary

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws]  Against
  2. [The Internet Filter] For (conditional on it filtering out 'the real nasties')
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  For
  4. [Gay marriage] For Civil Unions (i think)

See the full email below...

QLD Senate - Mark White (Independent) - Initial Reply

Mark White (QLD Senate Candidate) has responded with a detailed response. Mark seems quite articulate on many issues. 

Quick Summary:
  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For 
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against (conditionally against)
  4. [Gay marriage] Against 'marriage' / For 'same rights as any de-facto couple'
Full email below...

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Started to Rate my Ideal Candidates

For my Candidate Scoring Card, I've been trying to work out how to rate these candidate answers!

The difficulty I have is working out based on the short answers which candidates I want to back.

Where the real value of the candidate interactions has been, is in the additional explanation they've given, or how they've responded after being sent the Chimp Manifesto, or challenged on a particular view.

So what I'm looking for in a My ideal candidate:

  • They should be intelligent and capable of understanding the intricacies of difficult concepts and decisions.
  • The should seek

QLD Senate - David Smith (Labor) - Initial Reply

David Smith responded directly, no elaboration:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For 
  2. [The Internet Filter] For
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  For
  4. [Gay marriage] Against

QLD Senate - Brett Mason (LNP) - Initial Reply

Brett Mason (QLD Senate - LNP) responded directly to the questions without elaborating:



  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For 
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against - The compulsory labor one
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against
  4. [Gay marriage] Against

QLD Senate - Donald Bambrick (Independent) - Initial Reply

Donald Bambrick responded but didn't give direct for/against answers. I've had to interpret his for/against based on the wording of his email - read the full reply to see the context and.
  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] *Against - interpreted from extended answer* 
  2. [The Internet Filter] *Against - interpreted from extended answer*
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  *For - interpreted from extended answer*
  4. [Gay marriage] *For - But extended answer*

Full email below...

QLD Senate - Keith Douglas (Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party) - Initial Reply

Keith Douglas (QLD Senate - Australian Fishing and Lifestyle) has replied. With a longer and more involved response.

Quick Summary:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For 
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against
  4. [Gay marriage] For (no opposition)

Full response below...

QLD Senate - Paul and Mary Spencer (Independent) - Initial Reply

Paul and Mary Spencer (QLD Senate - Independent) responded with a longer response. They did not respond on the Internet Filter question as they do not know about the issue.

Quick Summary:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] Against 
  2. [The Internet Filter] *No Answer*
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against
  4. [Gay marriage] For (extended answer)
Full email linked below...

QLD Senate - E-Jay Lindsay-Park (Independent) - Initial Reply

E-Jay Lindsay-Park, Independent candidate for QLD sent quite a long and considered response, answering most questions directly.

Quick Summary
  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] Extended Answer - For
  2. [The Internet Filter] Extended Answer - Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Extended Answer - For
  4. [Gay marriage] No answer - says they'll "Represent the community"

Full email linked below.

Ryan Candidate - Sandra Bayley (Greens) - Initial Reply

Sandra sent a short response providing the following answers:

Response:

  1. [border protection] Against
  2. [internet filter] Against
  3. [price on carbon] For
  4. [gay marriage] For


I will follow this up later with more emails.

Monday, August 9, 2010

QLD Senate - Noel Jackson (D.L.P. - Democratic Labor Party) - Initial Reply

Quick Summary

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For
  2. [The Internet Filter] For
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against
  4. [Gay marriage] Against
I had quite an involved email exchange with Noel Jackson, after sending the Chimp Manifesto in reply to his answers. Noel seemed to take an interest in interacting with me, and picked up on some inconsistencies in the "Gay Marriage" issue and the history of marriage.


Full email below, and I'll post the other discussions we've had later.

QLD Senate - Mark Smith (Independent) - Didn't answer anything

Mark Smith (QLD Senate - Independent) replied, but well, he didn't really say anything at all other than
"I have covered some f your topics on marksmithforsenator.com and will be updating our site regularly during the election campaign. "
  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] *Can't Find Answer*
  2. [The Internet Filter] *Can't Find Answer*
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  *Can't Find Answer*
  4. [Gay marriage] *Can't Find Answer*
I went to his site, and well there's only a press release about the evils of poker machines - nothing on any of the questions asked - this is still true at time of writing. Can someone let me know if they find any updates on his site!

Brisbane Candidate - Ewan Saunders (Socialist Alliance) - Initial Reply

Pasodoff sent through Ewan Saunders' response for Brisbane Candidate Ewan Saunders (Socialist Alliance).

Quick Summary

  1. [border protection] Against
  2. [internet filter] Against
  3. [price on carbon] Against
  4. [gay marriage] For
Response is short and to the point as requested, full email below...

Brisbane Candidate - Mark A White (Family First) - Initial Reply

Pasodoff has forwarded the initial response for Mark White (Brisbane Candidate, Family First).


Quick Summary:

  1. [border protection] For
  2. [internet filter] Against
  3. [price on carbon] Against
  4. [gay marriage] Against


Mark makes a good point! 
"In line with your request I have answered for/against, which doesnt allow
for explaining why that position or what would make me change my position."


The intention is to follow up all these messages with a specific discussion on logic and reason - but initially the idea is to see who'll give a straight answer, and who can articulate their reasons.

Check the email for the full response.

NSW Senators are Next

Due to popular demand, I've started emailing NSW senators.

Same email, same aim.

I have 49 Senator's emails (from the AEC) - so I hope to get a few responses there.

I'm also going to start trying to track down emails or contact numbers for the ones I've missed in the first pass (due to missing info).

Stay tuned...

Brisbane Candidate - Andrew Bartlett (The Greens) - Initial Reply

Pasodoff has forwarded me the first of his correspondence with his candidates (seat of Brisbane).

Andrew Bartlett (Brisbane Candidate, The Greens) responded for/against and expanded - see the full email for details.

Quick Summary:

  1. [border protection] Against - (Read the full post)
  2. [internet filter] Against
  3. [price on carbon] For
  4. [gay marriage] For

Full email response below...

QLD Senate - Ian Nelson (One Nation) - Initial Reply

Ian Nelson answered the questions straight, no extra details:

Quick Summary

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] For
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against
  4. [Gay marriage] Against

QLD Senate - Wendy Francis (Family First) - Initial Reply

All of Wendy Francis' (QLD Senate - Family First) answers were extended, read the full post for details.

Quick Summary:


  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] Against
  2. [The Internet Filter] Against (in current form)
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  Against (we're not ready)
  4. [Gay marriage] Against



Who cares about science, logic or opinion!




How is it that we're happy to roll with science and stats when it agrees with us. But when it doesn't we dismiss it outright?

We still don't seem to be able to get past arguing about whether something WAS a good idea or not, even when waves of scientists and experts of different varieties chuck their hat in to the ring, no-one seems to care.

Interesting news article: Stiglitz sticks it to Abbott on stimulus 


Former World Bank chief economist Joseph Stiglitz has praised federal Labor's management of the nation's economy and its $42 billion stimulus package designed to stave off the worst of the global financial crisis.

But he's less stimulated by the coalition's economic ideas, saying the federal opposition had actually praised the architects of the global financial crisis.

At what point do you say to yourself. "Well, I've held this line long enough, the evidence is mounting that I'm wrong". 



Sunday, August 8, 2010

Ryan Candidate - Allan Vincent (Family First) - Initial Reply


Allan Vincent (Ryan Candidate - Family First) responded with a fair few words on each issue, see the full email below for details.

Quick Summary:

  1. [border protection] Extended Answer - (Read the full post)
  2. [internet filter] For - (Extended Answer)
  3. [price on carbon] Against (extended answer)
  4. [gay marriage] Against (extended answer)

See below for full response...

QLD Senate - Peter Findlay (Family First) - Initial Reply

Peter Findlay (Family First) didn't respond to anything except question 4 about gay marriage.

Quick Summary:

  1. [Hardening up Border Protection Laws] *No Answer*
  2. [The Internet Filter] *No Answer*
  3. [A Price on Carbon / ETS]  *No Answer*
  4. [Gay marriage] Against
He did however give me the "Won't somebody think of the children" line.
The Simpson's - Thinking of the children! :)
My reply to Peter is listed after his response.